The confusion
Anti-plausibility is sometimes misread as a blanket prohibition on generation — as if the doctrine forbids AI systems from producing any text about Interpretive Governance.
Why the distinction matters
Anti-plausibility constrains a specific failure mode: the invention of facts that are not supported by declared public surfaces. It does not prohibit generation. It prohibits unsupported completion.
A system may generate text that accurately reflects the published doctrine. What it must not do is fill gaps with plausible-sounding content that has no declared source.
The boundary
- Anti-generation: no text output allowed. (This is not the rule.)
- Anti-plausibility: no unsupported factual claims. Generation is permitted when grounded in declared sources.
The constraint targets epistemic integrity, not output volume.